I commend and thank Admin on the intelligence and wisdom of the recommendations made above.
A straight forward two-fold prediction can be made based on the academically improper solicitation made by the recruiter from the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine. The first part of the prediction is more general, that the University is an improperly managed entity. The second part, which stems from the first, as that even the most cursory investigation will reveal a school fraught with insufficiencies and irregularities punctuated with unethical and even illegal managerial practices. Such solicitations usually indicate a management that is motivated either by greed or, even worse, desperation. Either case spells risks for anyone who would be foolish enough to enroll.
Confirmation of this prediction will support the views of Admin and serve as an irrefutable warning that students should avoid colleges the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine and similar colleges.
Here are a but a few examples of the “irregularities” that confirm the prediction stemming from the wisdom of Admin. These confirmations are freely available on the internet and can be easily verified in many cases.
• The founder and still owner of the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine was convicted of a conspiracy and jailed in the United States.
• The University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine has a history of failed bids at formal accreditation. The school failed in a bid for approval from the State of New York in the United States. An application for approval for training licenses for students was also strongly rejected by the State of Florida in the United States in a most unflattering fashion. The report emphasized financial weakness and administrative inadequacy.
• The University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine violated the laws of the State of Texas in the United States of America, by operating illegally in that state.
• The University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine has feigned ownership of a large piece of land on the Caribbean Island of Sint Eustatius. The land is actually owned by a separate company owned by the family of the principal owner of the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine (purchase price of about 1.4 million US dollars). The University entered a contract to pay approximately .25 million US dollars annually to the family company as rent on undeveloped land, diverting funds from the financially stressed University that otherwise rents its facilities.
• Payouts have been made on behalf of a high academic official of the University who has been implicated in the sexual harassment against multiple female employees. Abuses of female students have also been reported. Another recently appointed official has been implicated as facilitating abuses of female students while at another institution.
• The children of both the President and the Provost of the University have been identified as internet trolls who abuse skeptics of the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine.
• Enrollments at the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine are near all time lows, despite over 10 years of operations.
• Rates of Faculty turnover of the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine are near all time highs.
• The Board of Governors of the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine was recently demoted and is now listed as a mere Board of Advisors, indicating the consolidation of authoritarian control at the University, an clear indicator of desperation.
• Financial stresses are growing grave, with high officials discussing/acknowledging these stresses openly in the news media, underscoring high risks of school closure.
• The University of Sint Eustatius recently fired many workers, citing financial hardships. At the same time, the institution is reporting to students and prospective students that no such hardships are being experienced and that the University is financially stable.
• The newly appointed Provost of the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine obtained his medical degree from a University that failed and closed.
• The newly appointed Provost of the University previously served at another international medical college that was forcibly closed due to impropriety.
• The newly appointed Provost of the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine was fired from a prior similar post that was held at an institution that is more credible than the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine.
• The newly appointed Provost of the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine is cited as participating in unfair labour practices, culminating in legal actions.
• The newly appointed Provost of the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine has been hiring inexperienced family members of dubious ethical standards as faculty members in contravention of local labour law in relation to hiring practices. Accreditation boards will look unfavourably upon demonstrably nepotistic faculty recruitment and retention.
• The principal owner of the University of Sint Eusatius School of Medicine has a history of betraying his partners and investors in the University.
• Although the Provost has claimed in legal documents that the University has had to fire personnel because of financial hardship at the University, he has recently promoted his son from the rank of Assistant Professor to the rank of Associate Professor.
• The University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine has a history of misrepresenting its prospects regarding accreditation and student financial support.
• The University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine advertised financial aid packages for students through a bank that was subsequently forced to close due to insolvency.
• The University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine has a history of misrepresenting its enrollment and hence its financial well being.
• The University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine maintains low admissions standards, regularly admitting students with histories of failure in undergraduate or other medical colleges. Major recruitment drives target such students based on perceived gullibility. The daughter of the Principal owner of the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine is quoted as saying, in relation to admission standards, that the school is “for anyone who wants to go.” The daughter of the owner featured in the news article was topless, indicating an institution replete with moral turpitude.
• One student was admitted after being dismissed from a medical college in the United States of America, being deemed unfit for the profession. This graduate of the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine has encountered significant professional perils, even recently losing a board certification in the State of Arizona in the United States.
• Students were widely admitted with false transcripts from a school in Cyprus, and officials of the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine were reported as complicit.
• Officials from Botswana removed their government sponsored students from the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine after discovering inadequacies in academics, social supports, and experiencing irregularities in billing.
• Religiously based abuses of students and faculty are being reported on campus.
• The University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine misrepresents its attrition rates and grossly exaggerates its first time passing rates on a standardized examination of achievment (USMLE Step 1). Despite a lack of enforcement of academic standards, attrition during the four year program is near 50%. For marketing purposes, school officials occasionally report that first time passing rates vary between 70% and 85%. Even after the loss of many students (many of whom are academically unqualified), passing rates on the USMLE Step 1 are actually only 30 – 40%.
• School officials have boasted that nearly 100% of their graduates obtain residencies. Of the small percentage of students successfully navigating the four year program, however, only about 50% secure residencies.
• The University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine gave false degrees to two if its employees. These degrees were partly responsible for the failed bid for accreditation in the State of New York in the United States.
• The University of Sint Eutatius School of Medicine has knowingly hired members of faculty who have served time in jail after committing offenses that threaten the safety of patients.
• The University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine is operated as a subsidiary of a publically registered company, Global Healthcare and Education Management, Inc. (GHEM). GHEM has a market value of only 40,000 US Dollars. This indicates that the entire University of Sint Eustatius is valued at less than 40,000 US dollars.
This is just sampling of the irregularities and offenses tied to the University of Sint Eustatius School of Medicine. They were easily predicted based on the danger signs reported by Admin.
I am grateful for the wisdom and intelligence expressed by Admin. One should not enroll in Universities with suspect enrollment practices.





